IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is comparable to other IEEE . Jun 4, 2012. After second revision, the submission's status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". Revise and upload your final submission. Revise and resubmit Withdrawn Total 2016 40 0 1 189 186 5 0 421 (10) (0) (0) (45) (44) (1) (0) (100) 2017 38 0 1 242 185 3 0 469 The good news is that a revise and resubmit decision indicates that your first submission is potentially a good "fit" for this venue. . R&R is a regular part of the publication process, together with "in process", "in review", "accepted . If the results are not enough, but useful, reject for journal X and advise to resubmit to journal Y (where Y expects less). Sometimes papers are rejected after the first round of reviews. In very few cases, a manuscript may be accepted for publication on first reading, with only minor revisions required. You have been waiting for that particular email since forever and it finally came. Whatever negative adjective gets applied to your work is irrelevant. romantic hotels scottsdale; life insurance awareness month marketing ideas; hdpe pipe sizes and dimensions. The editor wants to make it clear that the authors need to write a new paper, not . It means the journal editor likes "something" about your paper. Answer (1 of 7): My 1st SCI paper was rejected from 2 journals before the acceptance from the publishing journal(IEEE). For CHI'23 we made significant improvements to the revise and resubmit (R&R) process based on the feedback we received from CHI'22. January 2, 2021. Reject: The reviewers do not feel that either of the categories above is appropriate. Slightly less rare is an acceptance that is contingent upon suggested revisions. Time-saving tips for preparing your manuscript: strategies for acceptance on the first attempt! 1 After the reviewers have returned their feedback, the most likely outcome is a category 3 decision letter . If you do not receive your decision by August 19, please contact HICSS Conference Office immediately.4. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading 'reviewers' manuscript (major) revision'. Rejection is only possible in rare cases when authors ignore required modifications by reviewers/editor. Given the context, I imagine it just means revise and resubmit. In particular, resubmission applications have a better chance of being funded in comparison to original applications. Hotter AN. April 14, 2022. Not Discussed doesn't mean your application has no chance for resubmission, but it does mean that it has a long way to go if you decide to revise and resubmit. This is not the case for revise-and-resubmit letters. My wordy answer: As an Associate Editor, I have to think about precisely this issue on a regular basis. These were usually given out when further experimentation was required, probably motivated partially to avoid long revision times counting for the time-to-final-decision stats and partially by the reality that many authors would probably rather try . For example, I had a rejection in 8 hours, an acceptance in 2 days, a rejection in 9 months, and an acceptance in 18 months. . I read an article (about 3 years ago, sorry don't have the ref) that found most authors who get a 'revise and resubmit' never actually do anything further, but for the ones who made the suggested revisions the acceptance rate was quite high. Answer (1 of 5): Much better than when you submitted it (70-80%)! This can result in a long-drawn-out process that exhausts the authors, reviewers, and editor. Most authors agree that their papers are improved through the review process. A couple metrics are "time to acceptance after submission" and "time to print after submission." If a paper is officially rejected with invited resubmission, and a new version is resubmitted with revisions, then this dramatically cuts down on the time-between-submission-and-acceptance metric. You have been waiting for that particular email since forever and it finally came. In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, "major revision" means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while "minor revision" means that while changes should be made, no. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes . Minor revisions almost certain (95%). There are lots of advice blogs for authors that tell them not to sweat the revise and resubmit decision. The one deciding upon the acceptance or rejection of your paper is the editor, not the reviewers. . "Reject with option to resubmit" indicates that ignored comments will likely be met with a rejection and any rebuttals must be concrete. Chances are pretty good if you make the revisions. Most often, we talk about journal decisions in binary terms, i.e., journal acceptance and journal rejection. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or . Journal editors play two major roles. I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and "accept after minor revision" in the second round. "Revise and resubmit . Although acceptance rates in the CJHP vary according to the type of article, more than 50% of articles that are sent out for review are eventually accepted for publication in the Journal. However, it means that there are serious issues to be addressed. While, in both cases, there is a considerable amount of revisions to make, 'Accept with major revisions' means that the reviewer recommends to the journal editors to ultimately accept the manuscript after thorough revisions have been made by the author. Treat the reviewers' comments as free advice that will allow you to strengthen the content and presentation of your research. It is a "win . Read the letter from the editor carefully and make sure that you have indeed received a request to revise and resubmit your paper. eventual acceptance. But a Revise and Resubmit would have to be submitted from scratch under a new manuscript record. Others see it as an opportunity to dismiss the feedback received and simply submit the unedited paper to another journal. A decision of revise and resubmit (R&R) comes from the editor, having studied the reports. Step 2: Read the reviews. 2,741. In 2015, the NIH-wide success rate for new R01 applications was 13.1%, whereas the success rate for resubmission applications was 33.5%. Another ill-advised response to a request for revision is to do too little to revise the case and IM. After 1 week, the submission's status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". These were experiences without resubmit and revise (i.e. . I agree that there is a high chance of acceptance if the editor asks for major revision. uefa womens champions league 2020 winner Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. Nurse Author Ed, 8(1):1-3, 01 Jan 1998 Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 9582785. Refund Policy Already Paid APF. A decision of major revisions means you'll need to do some heavier work. It's fortunately rare, but I have been . In an extreme example, you do not need to fear that your paper is rejected due to a review saying nothing but: I recommend to reject this paper because of fish. "revising a paper and preparing a response document for the action editor and the reviewers who have invited these actions" ( Ireland, 2008, p. 1049). The referee's role is to give them advice on that. In revise-and-resubmit invitations, the editors, drawing on the referee reports, set parameters for what changes a manuscript needs before it can be accepted. 1. You saw a new email coming from a journal regarding the status of your manuscript submission. The editors of the Journal of Monetary Economics have concluded that your paper contains a contribution that is publishable when a small list of specified revisions is successfully executed. After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. As the author of a manuscript which has received an accept with minor revisions decision, you are to be congratulated. Rather than reacting badly to comments that seem nitpicky . Manage your emotional response to critical comments. The coupon code you entered is expired or invalid, but the course is still available! If the paper lacks this promise, the recommendation should be Reject. This can result in a long-drawn-out process that exhausts the authors, reviewers, and editor. After submitting my article for publication, after four months, I had finally received an acceptance. substantially improved after making the suggested edits. Revise and Resubmit: The 1AC and reviewers feel that there is potential for a publishable outcome for the submission, but not without major revisions to address issues enumerated by the reviewers. Writers who are inexperienced in assessing a response from an academic journal should take the help and guidance of other seasoned writers in doing the same. If a journal encourages you to revise and resubmit, the chances of acceptance and publication improve. Ho Congratulations if your paper reaches this step. You are going to face what is called the revise and resubmit (R&R) process, i.e. Revise and resubmit, somewhat less likely (20-30%). Rejection is only possible in rare cases when authors ignore required modifications by reviewers/editor. Read the letter from the editor. Note that unlike typical journals, the time frame for the . Authors receiving a "revise and resubmit" may be more likely to refute or ignore the editor's comments. If an AE issues a Revise and Resubmit recommendation, there is a good chance the AE will handle a future version of the paper. If a journal encourages you to revise and resubmit, the chances of acceptance and publication improve. The editor's goal is to publish good papers. . Often times, when a story is held for further consideration and then rejected, the rejection is either a standard or higher-tier form letter. Verifying the arrival of your manuscript and politely asking for feedback helps reduce needless frustrations. Ignore the "insults" and go straight to the corrections the reviewer wants. Your inadvisable criticisms will not be appreciated and may impede your chances for future acceptance. Acceptance with minor revisions. Chances are pretty good if you make the revisions. Revise minor problems and resubmit: signs of this are the editor mentioning a certain date for publication, adding references, developing conclusion, or defining terms. . Major revisions, assuming you do them or provide a very good reason why not, highly likely (50-60%). If a publisher liked a story enough to hold . Please note that an invitation to revise and resubmit does not guarantee eventual acceptance of your paper. . But they are giving you a chance and you are improving it. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday. Verifying the arrival of your manuscript and politely asking for feedback helps reduce needless frustrations. chances for final acceptance at the AEJ Macro are low, it is deemed better to give the authors the chance to resubmit their paper to another . In this case, it's not the rejection that influences my decision to resubmit, it's the fact the story was held. The most common responses to a submission are either a request to revise and resubmit the piece (also referred to as an R&R) or a rejection. Acceptance. It expresses the judgment that there is a high enough chance that after one or more rounds of revision, the paper will be a good enough to publish. Tracking your manuscript is one way to help the review process go smoothly and it keeps you actively involved.